The Justification Of War Has Been An Ideal That Has Caused Much Debate

The justification of war has been an ideal that has caused much debate and controversy for humanity throughout all time. It has been studied and interpreted by many theologians, philosophers, and politicians. There have many manuscripts documenting the correct use of war and the proper means of exercising force. Within the western tradition two main principles, the Christian and Islamic, have appeared that attempt to explain just war in relation to maintaining a peaceful society. Both of these traditions have similar main premises of a constant battle between a split society, one of good and the other of evil. However, there are many differences within each of the two respective religions view on the ideas of the conception of a well ordered society, the religious and secular influences on each ideology, and the justification and authorization of war. The Christian conception of a well-ordered, peaceful society, the City of God, was maintained and influenced by the ideal of just war. The City of God theory was created by St. Augustine of Hippo in the 4th century. His motivation for his writing was fueled by the decaying Roman Empire. St. Augustine felt that the collapse of the western empire to the invading barbarians resulted from the peaceful Christian ethic. "The charge was the traditional Christian pacifism had helped create untenable military circumstances for the western empire, the Church's concern to prepare it's members for the next life, had led to an ahistorical and socially irresponsible approach to the inescapable problems of individuals and societies in history (Tranquillitas Ordinis, Weigel)." Within his writings, he made a clear distinction between two cities, one that was based for Earthly living (City of Earth) and one that was based on love for God (City of God). He believed the City of Earth was capable of doin g good, however was fundamentally evil because the only pure good is God. There is a direct correlation between the City of Earth and the Roman Empire. Augustine pointed out the many achievements of the Roman State, but felt it did not give God his due (Holy War Idea, Johnson). In order to correct this situation God created salvation for the inhabitants of the City of Earth through grace. By altering human motivations to become properly ordered through the love for God (Holy War Idea, Johnson). With this love for God, the City of God will become a reality. This entire society stemmed from individual motivation, and for love of neighbor. Augustine felt that a selfish motivation was a sign of a sinner. Only a good person would have right motivation, which is expressed as love towards God. To maintain this peaceful society it would have to have the following three characteristics: Justice, Order, and Peace. To uphold these ideals, there existed a positive attitude towards just war. Jus t war aided the transformation from the presently evil world to the benevolent City of God. The Muslim concept of a well-ordered society, dar al-Islam, developed their ideals of jihad. Classical Islamic thought partitioned the world into two separate societies. The Dar al-Islam was considered the territory of peace, and the dar al-harb was literally the "territory of war". The dar al-Islam is an area that promotes and signifies the supremacy of Muslims beliefs. The dar-al Islam is the area of peace and justice, it is considered to be the most secure place for all humans. The people of this territory need not be Muslims, they have to acknowledge the Muslim rule, and they need to be of a monotheistic religion. Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians were all allowed to live within the Dar al-Islam peacefully. The important aspect of non-Muslims living within the dar al-Islam is their behavior. Right action, not right thought was used to define which inhabitants can exist within the Dar al-Islam. By Contrast, the dar a-Harb was the state of unrest and war. It is characterized by str ife and internal disorder (Islam and War, Kelsay). This disorder, if mobilized correctly could become a threat to the dar al-Islam. The peace of the world could only occur if it was all part of the dar al-Islam. These two areas were constantly in a state of war with each other. For Muslims to

US History Long Essay Sample

US History Long Essay SampleA US history long essay sample can be used as a way to help you with your composition, and it can be used as a means of getting feedback on your essay. Many students find that they need help when writing their assignments, so that is why they look to the internet for resources to help them with their assignments. One thing that a student should be aware of when they look at the resources available on the internet is that there are many different ways to use the essay samples available on the internet.If you are a college student that is looking for a US history long essay sample then there are a couple of things that you need to know about these samples. One thing that you need to be aware of is that you will have to do your own research in order to find the best resources for you to use. If you simply rely on the resources available for use in your essay then you may not be able to get the best results from using the resources.A US history long essay samp le is a great resource because it can give you all of the facts that you need to use in your essay. However, you have to take into consideration the fact that this is a large portion of your essay. If you have already read and studied the US history long essay sample then you will find that you have the information needed to properly complete your essay. However, if you did not use the resource you would be in a bad position to use it again because you will know nothing about the topic that you were given.You can find many resources that are dedicated to giving you all of the US history long essay sample that you will need to complete your assignment. When you are looking for these resources, it is important that you know what is expected of you in order to successfully complete your assignment. The assignment can vary from college to college and you have to be sure that you know the requirements that you need to fulfill in order to get the work completed. The next thing that you ne ed to know about the US history long essay sample is that it can give you many different ways to approach the topic. Many times you will find that this sample is used to get students interested in the topic that they are currently working on. They will be motivated to keep on working because of this.If you are looking for a US history long essay sample then you will find that it is a great resource because it can get you started with the topic that you are working on. The essay can give you all of the facts that you need and it can also give you the best way to go about writing your essay. You can find many different ways to approach the topic and you will be able to know how to approach the topic.The last thing that you need to know about the US history long essay sample is that you can use this essay for several different reasons. Sometimes you will find that this can be used in your essays or in the classroom as a way to help motivate students to stay motivated. You can also use the essay as a way to get students involved in various activities that you have set up at your school.The US history long essay sample is something that can be used in many different ways in the classroom. It can help students to understand the history of the United States as well as help them understand the basic idea behind the writing. The best thing that you can do is to find a good resource that will help you write your essay.

Peter and Susan are members of an animal rights Essays

Peter and Susan are members of an animal rights Essays Peter and Susan are members of an animal rights Essay Peter and Susan are members of an animal rights Essay Title: Peter and Susan are members of an carnal rights group named CFA ( Compassion for Animals ) . They are incensed at the policy of the EU of exporting unrecorded animate beings within the EU and from member provinces to other states throughout the universe. During a meeting of the CFA they propose to organize a March in two hebdomads clip with the intent of pulling attending to this pattern and showing against it. The March will continue through Wetcliffe, a big port and culminate at the central office of Cargo Ltd, the largest exporter in the U.K. The demonstrators assemble at Wetcliffe. There are about 500. Whilst assembled, and prior to the March commencing, Peter and Susan urge the demonstrators to stay peaceable in order to aerate their grudges more efficaciously. The demonstrators set off with Peter taking. As the March enters the town, the traffic is held up for 15 proceedingss and many of the local occupants are angry at the break the March is doing. Within proceedingss a little figure of the local occupants and a subdivision within the marchers are shouting maltreatment at each other and the temper of the March begins to acquire rather angry. Sergeant Burrows asks Peter and Susan to scatter half the group but they refuse and when the Sergeant asks them to deviate the March to climax some one half a stat mi from the central office of the Cargo Ltd. they once more refuse. Sergeant Burrows apprehensions Peter and Susan. The demonstrators arrive at Cargo Ltd. Jane and Robert reference, through loud hailers, their protagonists. A vocal group who are opposed to these positions are besides present, a group which includes several employees of Cargo Ltd. The latter threaten Jane and Robert with force if they do non scatter. Anxious at the possible eruption of force the constabulary apprehension Jane and Robert. The crowd is, by now, counter and the employees of Cargo Ltd cry and do opprobrious marks which antagonises the demonstrators. Some of the demonstrators retaliate by throwing missiles. Eight of the demonstrators light a fire under one of the lorries. The constabulary arrive and consequence several apprehensions including the eight demonstrators who had torched the lorry. Meanwhile Sergeant Burrows returns to the local Police Station with Peter and Susan. He has learnt that they live together and that their level is en path to the Police Station. He decides to come in and seek their premises on the evidences that he might happen inside informations of future riotous assemblages, believing Peter and Susan to be trouble makers. He finds nil but seizes a DVD redact, which is still in the box and Tells Peter and Susan that he believes this to be stolen. On reaching at the Police Station Peter and Susan are put in the cells, where they are left for 9 hours before being released with no charge. Explain the legality of the above incidents with mention to the powers of them constabularies to collar, the duties of the demonstrators and the human rights context. Let us get down with a treatment associating to the legality of the apprehension of Peter [ P ] and Susan [ S ] by Sergeant Burrows [ B ] : Apprehensions are of two sorts: a ) With a warrant and B ) without a warrant. There is no information provided in the facts of this instance which suggest that B did in fact obtain a warrant for the apprehension of P and S, and as such we will continue on the premise that the relevant jurisprudence in inquiry falls within the latter of the above two classs. The relevant jurisprudence refering the powers of apprehension without a warrant, by constabulary constables, are contained within subdivision 24 of PACE, as amended by subdivision 110 ( 1 ) of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005: Section 1 of the 2005 Act states that a constable may collar without a warrant ( a ) anyone who is about to perpetrate an offense ; ( B ) anyone who is in the act of perpetrating an offense ; ( degree Celsius ) anyone whom he has sensible evidences for surmising to be about to perpetrate an offense, and ; ( vitamin D ) anyone whom he has sensible evidences for surmising to be perpetrating an offense. Section 110, ss4 of the Act states that a constable may merely do such an apprehension where he has ‘reasonable grounds’ for believing that such an apprehension is ‘necessary’ . Section 110, ss5 of the 2005 Act stipulates the valid grounds which may take to such a ‘reasonable belief’ in the necessity of the app rehension. Let us now consider whether there is any information within the facts of our instance which might propose that B was justified in doing his apprehension of P and S: We are non told the grounds behind the apprehension: we are told nevertheless that P and S refused both ‘to disperse half the group’ and ‘to divert the March to climax some one and a half miles’ off from its proposed finish, at the central office of Cargo Ltd. We are besides told that the March, in which P. and S. are members, was barricading up portion of the town, with ‘traffic [ being ] held up for 15 minutes’ . Let us now ascertain whether any of the above facts might fulfill s110, US Secret Service ( 1 ) , US Secret Service ( 4 ) and US Secret Service ( 5 ) of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005: P. and S’s refusal to deviate the March to a different finish clearly does non represent an offense in itself, and as such, B was non empowered under s110 ( 1 ) of the Act to collar them on this land. In respect to P and S’s refusal to scatter half the crowd ; B might hold deemed this refusal as representing an offense under the Highway Obstruction Act, in visible radiation of the fact that P and S both orchestrated the March and were hence, at least to some extent, in control of the crowd [ we are told that the March was ‘being led by P’ ] and hence non merely responsible for the obstructor, but in a place to scatter it. In this manner, B might hold perceived that he was legitimately entitled to collar them under s110 ( 1 ) of the 2005 Act. However, it would be hard to reason that the apprehension of P and S would hold served to take this obstructor, and as such, whilst fulfilling the ground specifications of s110 ( 5 ) ( V ) of the 2005 Act [ ‘causing an improper obstructor of the highway’ ] , an apprehension on this land would about surely be deemed improper due to s110 ( 4 ) which required B to hold an apprehension necessary in order to foresta ll the obstructor in inquiry, when clearly the apprehension would non, and did non [ the March go oning regardless of the absence of P and S ] , have this consequence. In respect to their personal presence [ i.e. being portion of the obstructor themselves ] , B may hold believed that P and S were themselves in breach of the Highway Obstruction Act, and as such had evidences under s110 ( 1 ) of the 2005 Act to do an apprehension. For the apprehension to be lawful nevertheless, B must hold once more deemed the apprehensionnecessary[ s110 ( 4 ) ] upon one of the evidences specified in s110 ( 5 ) , and it is my contention that this statement would neglect: the facts presented to us make non bespeak that B of all time really asked P and S to travel themselves, simply to scatter some of the other dissenters, and as such an apprehension was non yetnecessaryin order to take the obstructor ; had they been asked to travel themselves and so refused, there is no uncertainty that all the legal commissariats would hold been satisfied to guarantee that the apprehension made by B was lawful, but this is non apparent from the facts provided, and this statement must therefore fail. With respects to B’s common jurisprudence power to do apprehension under the Public Order Act 1936 ; there is no grounds to propose that P and S were doing an altercation, or that their refusals were, or were likely to do any breach of the peace, and as such, in visible radiation of the determination in Wershof V Metropolitan Police Commissioner [ 1978 ] , we can disregard an probe into this possible claim. In decision, the apprehension of P and S had no lawful footing and must been seen as a cardinal breach of their cardinal human right to single autonomy, as protected by Article 5 of the ECHR and enacted into English jurisprudence by the Human Rights Act 1998. P and S would hence be absolutely within their rights to establish an action against the constabulary force on the land of improper apprehension. Likewise, it appears that B did non inform them of the grounds for the apprehension ( as required by PACE, s28 ) , and this would be sufficient evidences, in itself, for a successful action against the constabulary for improper apprehension ( e.g. Christie V Leachinski 1947 ) . As for the apprehension of Jane [ J ] and Robert [ R ] ; whilst s110 ( 5 ) ( two ) of the 2005 Act stipulates that an apprehension may be deemed necessary ( ss4 ) in order to forestall them from being harmed ( the employees of Cargo Ltd were endangering them with force ) , J and R were non themselves perpetrating any offense and as such no lawful apprehension could be justified under ss1 of this Act. Prima facie, their references made via loud-speakers might be seen as representing incitation to breach of the peace under the Public Order Act 1936, but there is no grounds provided which suggests that J. and R. were motivating the crowd to do any breach of the peace, and as such, in visible radiation of the determination in Wershof V Metropolitan Police Commissioner [ 1978 ] , must neglect. In decision, the apprehension of J and R had no lawful footing and must been seen as a cardinal breach of their cardinal human right to single autonomy, as protected by article 5 of the ECHR, as ena cted into English jurisprudence by the Human Rights Act 1998. J and R would hence be absolutely within their rights to establish an action against the constabulary force on this land. Likewise, it appears that B did non inform them of the grounds for the apprehension ( as required by PACE, s28 ) , and this would be sufficient evidences, in itself, for a successful action against the constabulary for improper apprehension ( e.g. Christie V Leachinski 1947 ) . This Section is designed ‘to protect the person against the extra or maltreatment of the power of apprehension, ’ ( Hill v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire 1990 ) in the same manner that Article 5 of the ECHR efforts to protect such violations of personal autonomy. As for the apprehensions of the eight demonstrators who lit a fire under the lorry ; clearly s110 ( 1 ) is satisfied by their blazing offense of incendiarism, and ss4 would be satisfied as an apprehension was necessary to forestall these attackers from doing farther harm ( s110 ( 5 ) ( degree Celsius ) ( three ) ) and to let the prompt and effectual probe of this offense and their behavior ( s110 ( 5 ) ( vitamin E ) ) . It should be noted that we are told the constabulary effected ‘several apprehensions including the eight demonstrators who had torched the lorry’ , connoting that more than these eight people were arrested. There is nil from the facts to bespeak which other parties were arrested, whether demonstrators or employees of Cargo Ltd, and as such any treatment of the legality of these extra apprehensions would be strictly bad. In respects to the duties of the demonstrators in this inquiry ; the jurisprudence must endeavor to strike the right balance between freedom of look, in leting protestors to voice their sentiments, and doing certain that the demonstrators do non motivate racial hate or alienation, promote blasphemy or promote violent behavior [ or take portion in such behaviour ] . In our instance the apprehensions of J, R, P and S were, leading facie, illegal ; none of these parties being in breach of their duties as demonstrators to maintain the peace ( we are even told that Peter and Susan urged the demonstrators to stay peaceable! ) . Clearly nevertheless the demonstrators responsible for the incendiarism onslaught on the lorry were in breach of their duties and the jurisprudence as such provided sufficient evidences for their lawful apprehension. With respect to B’s entrance of P and S’s premises: there is no indicant that they gave consent to such entry ( as per Code of Practice B, para 4 ) , and about surely B had non obtained a hunt warrant in conformity with subdivision 8 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. In Thomas V Sawkins [ 1935 ] , a common jurisprudence right to come in without such a warrant in order to ‘deal with or forestall a breach of the peace’ was entertained. In visible radiation of the fact that B entered on evidences that ‘he might happen inside informations of future riotous gatherings’ and as such, was for the specific intent of ‘preventing a [ hereafter ] breach of the peace’ , a tribunal might keep that such entry was lawful, although the instance of McLoed v UK ( 1998 ) seemed to set such a contention to rest as being a breach of Article 8 of the ECHR [ regard for place and private life ] . Assuming that a lawful right to entry could be e stablished, which I do non strongly believe to be the instance in visible radiation of the human rights context and the determination in the aforesaid ECHR instance, allow us now analyse the legality of the hunt conducted on P and S’s premises by Bacillus: Again, we can presume that B did non obtain a warrant to seek the premises. We besides know that P and S were non present in their house at the clip of, or instantly anterior to their apprehension. As such, the relevant jurisprudence is contained within s18 PACE, which permits a hunt of an arrested person’s house if ‘reasonable evidences exist to surmise that there is, on the premises, grounds associating to the offense for which the individual was arrested, or other arrest-able offences’ . B believed P and S to be trouble makers in visible radiation of their earlier refusals to collaborate, and as such there is no uncertainty that he believed such sensible evidences to be. As for B’s ictus of the cd-writer ; the instance of Ghani V Jones [ 1970 ] outlined status by which a constable may legitimately prehend points which have nil to make with his original grounds for entry. None of these conditions would be satisfied in this instance. S19 ( 2 ) PACE states that such points may be seized if there are sensible evidences to propose that the points in inquiry have been obtained through offense, and remotion of the points is necessary to forestall them being later concealed, lost, damaged or destroyed ; the presence of a bran-new boxed Cadmium author nevertheless does non look sufficient to warrant sensible evidences, and as such, I must reason that this ictus was improper. The last issue to discourse is the length of clip that P and S were detained at the constabulary station without charge ; in visible radiation of the fact that the apprehension was doubtless illegal, P and S would hold clear rights to take action for false imprisonment. If the apprehension had been lawful nevertheless, there would hold been no job with the length of clip [ 9 hours ] for which they were detained [ 96 hours maximum- PACE ] , every bit long as they were allowed to confer with a canvasser ( s58 PACE ) and have a friend or household informed of their apprehension and detainment ( s56 PACE ) , should they so wish. Mentions: Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 Public Order Act 1936 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1987 [ PACE ] Police Act 1997 Wershof V Metropolitan Police Commissioner [ 1978 ] 3 All ER 540 Hill V Chief Constable of South Yorkshire ( 1990 ) 1 All ER 1046 Thomas V Sawkins [ 1935 ] 2 KB 249 McLoed V UK ( 1998 ) 28 EHRR 493 Ghani V Jones [ 1970 ] 1 QB 693

Explore the potential problems and issues that an organization would Essay

Explore the potential problems and issues that an organization would need to consider when re-sourcing requirements back to thei - Essay Example In recent years however, the benefits of outsourcing have decreased due to increasing costs of production in Asia, long-lead times, poor communication with Asian countries, large quantities for minimum orders, as well as poor quality of products (Green, 2013). Due to these issues, outsourcing countries have made attempts to re-source their production back to their home countries. Undoubtedly, major challenges are foreseen in on-shoring or re-sourcing, not the least of which involves loss of profits, which to any business is always problematic (Green, 2013). Still, businesses have gradually initiated efforts to re-source their production to their home countries mostly because they believe it would be the better option for them in the long run. This paper shall now explore the potential problems and issues than an organization would need to consider when re-sourcing requirements back to their home country and how these potential problems might be addressed or mitigated by the procureme nt function. Body There are different problems which have and will likely emerge for businesses seeking to re-source or in-source their production processes. ... This would imply the importance of some elements of IT skill in the related area, alongside an effective population having the right attitude to flourish in careers related to IT (Williams, 2012). The location need not be in the cities or metropolitan areas, but an area which is still big enough to support the logistics of its production processes. The chosen area must also be low-cost (Qu, et.al., 2010). In general, areas which are the most efficient sources of modern technology have become very expensive areas to reside in; as such, wages for these areas are also expectantly higher than other areas. Under these conditions, it would be difficult for the businesses seeking to establish new re-sourcing areas to achieve profitability without having to sacrifice either the availability of the best technology or the lower wages of the employees (Hirscheim, 2000). The importance of securing an educational system which is responsive to the needs of the industry is also a challenge for thes e businesses. A significant decrease in IT graduates has been observed in the past decade and some areas have even eliminated IT education from their curriculum. The challenge for these corporations would be to revive the enthusiasm of the young population in order to be more responsive to the needs of these businesses and to work out technology issues (Williams, 2012). General Motors has recently considered relevant moves in order to secure insourcing of elements of its production process, mostly bringing back work to Austin, Texas (Thibodeau, 2012). Its insourcing move was however very much challenged with the limited relevant skills needed from its new employees

Human resource management. Training and development Essay

Human resource management. Training and development - Essay Example It increases the level of individual and organisational competence and helps to reconcile the gap between what should happen, and desired targets and standards of performance; and what is happening and actual levels of work performance. According to Armstrong (2001): "training needs analysis is partly concerned with defining the gap between what is happanng and what should happen. However, it is necessary to avoid falling into the trap of adopting the "deficiency model" approach, which implies that training is only about putting things rights that have gone wrong" (Armstrong, 2001, p. 551-552). Training needs assessment is necessary to ensure an adequate supply of staff who are technically and socially competent, and capable of career advancement into specialist departments or management positions. There is, therefore, a continual need for the process of staff development, and training fulfils an important part of this process. Training should be viewed, therefore, as an integral part of the process of total quality management. Armstrong divides training needs assessment into three levels: corporate, group and individual level (Armstrong, 2001). A large number of organisations make some use of separate training needs analysis, although this is usually a periodic rather than a regular activity. There are many different ways of conducting such assessments, but they usually involve some form of survey, either by discussion or questionnaire, with managers. This does not automatically remove the problem of a failure to perceive the real needs, which occurs with annual appraisals (Beardwell, Holden, 2004). The same people are involved, and unless they are provoked by the approach into a different way of thinking, the probability is that their response will be the same as in the appraisal. One approach, which is somewhat broader than an assessment of training needs is to design a workshop for senior managers to work through what is needed to implement some of the strategic decisions the company has made (Reed, 2001). Part of this workshop would involve a consideration of the skills required against what they feel exists within the company. This can help managers to perceive needs which may otherwise be hidden to them, such as the many capabilities needed to manage strategic alliances, and the degree to which the managers who report to them have experience or knowledge that is relevant. Another approach is bottom-up feedback. This approach can be used in performance management processes, as a basis for personal improvement, and in order to gain a more objective view of company capabilities and areas of management weakness. They are particularly useful for measuring capabilities in management and interpersonal skills, aspects of a manager's behaviour which are experienced by others besides a manager's boss, peers and subordinates, and in some cases customers and suppliers. All the methods take readings from one or all of these groups of people, as well as requiring the manager to undertake a

Abuse in the Novel Beloved Essay Example for Free

Abuse in the Novel Beloved Essay Many of the characters from the novel Beloved suffered extreme abuse. Sethe, an independent mother, was no exception to the abuse. Sethe survived through many different accounts of mistreatment. The school teacher’s nephews made Sethe suffer the cruelest oppression. They held her down against her will, while she was pregnant, and brutally stole the milk that her body was producing for her child. This is the worst pain for Sethe because, besides the obvious obtrusions, she feared she would not be able to provide for her baby after it was born. A mother’s worst fear is being unable to provide for her children and this is the fear they instilled in her. This was not the end of the violence toward Sethe from these[insert a word that means a group of abusers here]. When the school teacher founds out that Sethe tells of the mistreatment she suffered because of his nephews he orders them to whip her. Sethe is brutally beaten by this group of young men. The result of the merciless beaten is a form of large scars that shape a tree on Sethe’s back. The tree may be a symbol of a family tree, and in Sethe’s case an incomplete family tree. Sethe’s family tree is incomplete because she killed her daughter, Beloved. The ghost of Sethe’s murdered daughter, Beloved, haunts the house where Sethe and the rest of her family live. The ghost torments them enough to drives away Sethe’s two sons, Howard and Buglar. Sethe undergoes torment from almost every possible angle but she refuses to run away any more.

Theme of Suffering in Musee des Beaux Arts by W.H. Auden Essay examples

A poem is a great way to express your feelings as well as get your point across. Each poet tells their story but sometimes it isn't so easy to figure out what it is trying to say. There are occasions where you have to break that poem into pieces and figure the story behind that selection. These individual pieces come together like a puzzle to teach you the lesson it intended to teach. The different pieces in the poem we read can give you a general idea of suffering, the idea that people undergo pain and distress. In the poem 'Musee des Beaux Arts' by W.H. Auden it is under that suffering occurs everywhere while not always seen, however, when seen everyone is apathetic. Within the poem, Auden makes a reference to the Greek myth of Icarus. Icarus falls to his watery grave after flying to close to the sun. ?First the fisherman, shepard and the farmer are on the scene at the time of Icarus? fall, not as he and Daedalus simply soar overhead like gods?. (Ruby Mary K & Marie Rose Napierkowski: 154-155). This line tells us how three men saw them flying as if they were gods. is that the ?failure? of Icarus is of little importance to these living and laboring, that, as a German proverb states, ?No plough is stopped for the sake of a dying man? (Ruby Mary K & Marie Rose Napierkowski: 154-155). As this quote describes the three men did not stop what they were doing to help Icarus who was dying. Two of the men did not see Icarus suffering so they went along with their lives, but the fisherman saw Icarus struggling as the water entered his lungs. The fisherman went along with his life and just let Icarus die. Later on in Auden?s poem he states that . The expens ive delicate ship that must have seen something amazing, a boy falling out of t... ...f the canvas? (Ruby Mary K & Marie Rose Napierkowski: 154-155). In this painting Jesus suffers as he drags the large cross to his execution. Besides for their own comfort there was a reason to kill Jesus. He endured pain and suffering throughout his whole journey. From all of the people in the painting you can see that there were people who witnessed his suffering, but they were withheld from helping by the torturer and ?the torturers horse?. Breughel painted ?human position? and ?how it takes place?. Each of his three paintings depicts W.H Auden?s idea of people and their relationship with suffering. W.H Auden?s ?Musee des Beaux Arts? there are many allusions to others suffering. These examples all help to support the moral of his poem. Suffering is all around us, yet we still do nothing to stop it. This illustrates his point by showing ignorance in all people.